AMERICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY

Economics 541

Spring 2007

Reading List and Selective Guide to the Field

 

 

Professor Hugh Rockoff

Department of Economics

New Jersey Hall

Rutgers University

732-932-77857

 

Rockoff@econ.rutgers.edu

WWW.fas-econ.rutgers.edu/home/rockoff

 

Hours: Tuesday 3-5, Friday 3-5, or by appointment

 

 

Last Updated: Wednesday, January 17, 2007. This reading list has been revised to reflect the strong preference in the class for macro-money-finance topics.

 

 

Purpose. This course surveys the economic history of the United States from the Colonial period to the present day. The central purpose is to show how economic analysis illuminates past trends and events; and how, at the same time, an understanding of economic history illuminates current economic problems. 

                                 

 

Textbook. I do not require that you read a textbook, but I recommend that you buy a copy of Hugh Rockoff and Gary Walton, History of the American Economy to provide more background.

 

 

Weekly Assignments, Examinations, and the Research Paper.

 

 

Weekly Assignments: Each week, on Friday, you will deliver to me a one page double-spaced summary of the key points in the assigned readings in narrative form -- not an outline.  They are due in class or by email and are worth 10 percent of your grade. They will not be marked for quality, but for each one you miss, you will lose 1 percent.  The object is to get you to think quickly and concisely about what you have read. The first assignment is actually a graphing exercise.

 

 

Examinations. There will be two exams each worth 25 percent of your grade. They will consist of essay questions about the major topics we cover. The tests will not be cumulative.

 

 

Research Paper. Approximately 40 percent of your grade will be based on a research paper of approximately 30 pages (including graphs, tables, and references) due on Monday, April 30 at 9:00 am. Late papers will be assessed a 2 percent penalty for each day they are late up to 16 percent. During the first two weeks of the semester it is your job to stop by my office to get acquainted and to begin discussing your paper topic. A one-page abstract is due on Friday January 30. A 5-page (or longer) progress report is due on Friday, March 2. It is expected that the research paper will contribute to knowledge in economic history by examining new evidence, or reexamining existing evidence. Papers that compare the American experience with the experience of some other country are welcome. Some suggestions on how to find a good topic are in the appendix at the end of the syllabus.

 

 

 

Semester at a glance

 

 

Class, Date

 

 

Topic

1. Tuesday, January 16

Phases of American Economic History

 

2. Friday, January 19

Salient features of American Economic History

 

 

First assignment: graph variables

 

3. Tuesday, January 23

The Old Regime and the New (1)

 

4. Friday, January 26

No Class

 

 

Second assignment: summarize Calomiris

 

5. Tuesday, January 30

The Old Regime and the New (2); Abstract for paper due.

 

6. Friday, February 2

Financial History, 1791-1830 (1)

 

 

Third assignment:

Summarize Grubb

 

7. Tuesday, February 6

Financial History, 1831-1860 (2)

 

8. Friday, February 9

Economics of American Slavery (1)

 

 

Fourth assignment:

Summarize Fogel and Engerman

 

9. Tuesday, February 13

Economics of American Slavery (2)

 

10. Friday, February 16

The Economic Impact of the Civil War

 

 

Fifth assignment:

 

Willard, Kristen L., Timothy W. Guinnane, and Harvey S. Rosen

 

11. Tuesday, February 20

The South After the Civil War (Sharecropping)

 

12. Friday, February 23

No Class

 

 

 

Sixth assignment:

 

Ransom, Roger L. and Richard Sutch. “Debt Peonage in the Cotton South After the Civil War.” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 32, No. 3 (Sep., 1972), pp. 641-669. (JSTOR)

 

 

13. Tuesday, February 27

Integration of Domestic Markets in the Postbellum Era

 

14. Friday, March 2

Transcontinental RRs (Land Grants).

 

 

Seventh assignment:

 

(1) James, John A. “The Development of the National Money Market, 1893-1911.” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 36, No. 4 (Dec., 1976), pp. 878-897. (JSTOR)

 

(2) Progress report on Term Paper due.

 

 

15. Tuesday, March 6

Transcontinental RRs (Social Savings)

 

16. Friday, March 9

First Exam

 

 

Eighth assignment:

 

Prepare for Midterm Exam

 

March 12-March 16

Spring Break – work on papers

 

17. Tuesday, March 20

The United States and the Gold

Standard

18. Friday, March 23

Banking Panics and the Founding of the Federal Reserve System

 

 

Ninth assignment:

 

Jeffrey Miron, “Financial Panics, the Seasonality of the Nominal Interest Rate and the Founding of the Fed,” American Economic Review (March 1986). (JSTOR)

 

 

19. Tuesday, March 27

 

World War I (Mobilization)

 

20. Friday, March 30

World War I (Legacies)

 

 

Tenth assignment:

 

Hugh Rockoff, “Until it’s over, over there: the U.S. Economy in World War I,”  in Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, The Economics of World War I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 310-345.

 

 

21. Tuesday, April 3

The Roaring Twenties

 

22. Friday, April 6

The Great Depression (One Darned Thing after Another)

 

 

Eleventh assignment:

 

Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965, pp. 299-545, especially 299-332.

 

 

 

23. Tuesday, April 10

What Caused the Great Depression?

 

24. Friday, April 13

World War II (The Military

Front)

 

Twelfth assignment:

 

Friedman, Milton. "Price, Income and Monetary Changes in Three Wartime Periods." American Economic Review (May 1952): 612-625.

 

 

25. Tuesday, April 17

No Class – Rained Out

 

26. Friday, April 20

The Evolution of the Labor Market

 

 

Thirteenth assignment:

 

Carolyn Moehling will lecture on the evolution of the labor market on April 20. The assignment will be to read and find the fatal flaw in:

 

*Donohue, John J., III, and James Heckman. "Continuous Versus Episodic Change: The Impact of Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks." Journal of Economic Literature (December, 1991): 1603-43.

 

27.Tuesday, April 24

International Convergence

 

28. Friday, April 27

Final Exam

 

 

Fourteenth assignment:

 

Write your term paper!

 


 

                          Readings

 

The readings for each week are divided into starred readings and supplementary readings. You must read and summarize the starred readings. The supplementary readings are intended for students who wish to pursue a topic in greater depth, especially for students whose research paper will be related to that topic.

 

Many of the starred readings are available at JSTOR or other sites. I will make available copies of the other starred readings.

 

 

                        1. January 16

 

          Scope and Methodology of Economic History

 

(You do not need to summarize the starred readings for this class)

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 1.

 

*Claudia Goldin, “Cliometrics and the Nobel,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (Spring 1995), pp. 191-208.

 

*McCloskey, Donald N. (1976) "Does the Past Have Useful Economics." Journal of Economic Literature 14: 434-61.

 

Rockoff, Hugh. "History and Economics." in Engaging the Past, Eric H. Monkkonen, ed., (Durham: Duke University Press, 1994), 48-76.

 

David, Paul A. "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75 (1985): 332-337.

 

Fogel, Robert W. "The Specification Problem in Economic History." Journal of Economic History (September 1967): 283-308.

 

North, Douglass C. "Structure and Performance: The Task of Economic History."  Journal of Economic Literature 16 (1978): 963-78.

 

Redlich, Fritz. "'New' and Traditional Approaches to Economic History and Their Interdependence." Journal of Economic History

25 (December, 1965): 480-95.

 

 

2. Friday, January 19

 

Salient features of American Economic Growth

 

(You do not need to summarize the starred readings for this class, however you do need to do the exercise with two stars)

 

 

**Graph annual growth rates for population, the price level, real GDP, and real GDP per capita from 1790 to 2004.  Produce an excel graph for each series.  Identify the key periods.  Think about how to present the material! Name one potential problem (for example an index number problem) with each series.

 

One source for these series is http://eh.net/hmit/gdp/

 

Note: www.eh.net is a very useful website for economic history, data and other important questions. Go explore it.

 

You can also use the series from Historical Statistics of the United States: Millenial Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). It can be accessed through the Rutgers library site. This source is essential and should be the site that you normally rely on for annual time series.

 

 

*Paul M. Romer, “Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth,” American Economic Review (May 1996), pp. 202-206. (JSTOR)

 

*Wright, Gavin. The Origins of American Industrial Success, 1879-1940,” American Economic Review. Vol. 80 (4). p 651-68. September 1990. (JSTOR)

 

Gordon, Robert J., “Does the ‘New Economy’ Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (Autumn 2000), pp. 49-74.  (NBER Working Paper 7833, August 2000).

 

B. Zorina Khan, “Property Rights and Patent Litigation in Early Nineteenth Century America,” Journal of Economic History 55 (March 1995), pp. 58-97.

 

Robert E. Gallman, “Economic Growth and Structural Change in the Long Nineteenth Century,” in Stanley Engerman and Robert E. Gallman, The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, (2000) Vol II, pp. 1-56.

 

Moses Abramovitz and Paul A. David, “Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress,” in Stanley Engerman and Robert E. Gallman, The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, (2000) Vol III, pp. 1-98.

 

Robert J. Gordon, “Interpreting the One Big Wave in U.S. Productivity Growth,” in Bart van Ark, et. al. Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth (Kluwer, 2000). Or http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/gordon/338.pdf or (NBER Working Paper 7752, June 2000).

 

Nicholas F.R. Crafts, “The First Industrial Revolution: A Guided Tour for Growth Economists,” American Economic Review (May 1996), pp. 197-207.

 

Stephen N. Broadberry, “Comparative productivity in British and American manufacturing during the nineteenth century, Explorations in Economic History 31 (1994), pp. 21-48.

 

Stephen Broadberry, “How did the United States and Germany overtake Britain? A Sectoral analysis of comparative productivity levels, 1870-1990,” Journal of Economic History 58 (1998), pp. 375-407.

 

Richard Nelson and Gavin Wright, “The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 30 (4). p 1931-64. (December 1992).

 

 

 

3. Tuesday, January 23

 

The Old Regime and the New (1)

 

*Charles A. Calomiris, “Institutional Failure Monetary Scarcity and the Depreciation of the Continental,” Journal of Economic History (1988), pp. 47-68. (JSTOR)

 

Harper, Lawrence. “The Effects of the Navigation Acts on the Thirteen Colonies.” In The Era of the American Revolution, ed. Richard Morris (New York: Columbia University Press, 1939).

 

This is the classic study of the effects of British Mercantilism. The Cliometricians have also explored the issue.

 

McClelland, Peter D. “The Cost to America of British Imperial Policy.” The American Economic Review > Vol. 59, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-first Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1969), pp. 370-381 

 

Reid, Joseph D. Jr.”Economic Burden: Spark to the American Revolution?” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 38, No. 1, The Tasks of Economic History (Mar., 1978), pp. 81-100.

 

Reid, Joseph D. On Navigating the Navigation Acts with Peter D. McClelland: “Comment.” Joseph D. Reid, Jr. The American Economic Review > Vol. 60, No. 5 (Dec., 1970), pp. 949-955.

 

McClelland, Peter D. “On Navigating the Navigation Acts with Peter McClelland: Reply.” The American Economic Review > Vol. 60, No. 5 (Dec., 1970), pp. 956-958.

 

 

4.Friday, January 26 (No Class)

 

5.Tuesday, January 30

 

The Old Regime and the New (2)

 

(Abstract of Paper due)

 

*Farley Grubb, “Creating the U.S. Dollar Currency union, 1748-1811: A Quest for Monetary Stability or a Usurpation of State Sovereignty for Personal Gain,” American Economic Review (December 2003), p. 1778-1797. (JSTOR)

 

Hugh Rockoff, “How Long did it take the United States to Become an Optimal Currency Area?” NBER Historical Paper 124,(2000).

 

Charles A. Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1913).

 

This is a classic study. It argued that economic motives explain the Constitution.

 

Robert A. McGuire and Robert L. Ohsfeldt, “An Economic Model of Voting Behavior over Specific Issues at the Constitutional Convention of 1787,” Journal of Economic History (1986), pp. 79-112.

 

 

Cathy Matson, “The Revolution, the Constitution and the New Nation,” in R. Gallman and S. Engerman, eds. Cambridge Economic History of the United States Vol I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 363-401.

 

 

6. Friday, February 2.

 

Financial History, 1791-1830 (1)

 

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 12.

 

*Temin, Peter. "The Economic Consequences of the Bank War."
The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, No. 2 (Mar., 1968), pp. 257-274.(JSTOR).

 

*Temin, Peter. "The Anglo-American Business Cycle, 1820-60." 
The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 27, No. 2 (May, 1974), pp. 207-221. (JSTOR)

 

Temin, Peter. The Jacksonian Economy, New York: Norton, 1969.

 

 

7. Tuesday, February 6

 

Financial History, 1791-1830 (2)

 

 

Rockoff, Hugh. "The Free Banking Era: A Re‑Examination," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, May 1974, pp. 141‑173.

 

Rockoff, Hugh."New Evidence on Free Banking in the United States," American Economic Review 76 (September 1986): 886‑889.

 

*Rolnick, Arthur J., and Warren E. Weber. "New Evidence on the Free Banking Era." American Economic Review 73 (1983): 1080-1091. (JSTOR)

                             

Engerman, Stanley. "A Note on the Economic Consequences of the Second Bank of the United States," Journal of Political Economy 78 (July/August 1970): 72528.

 

Hammond, Bray. Banks and Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1957, passim.

 

Kahn, James A. "Another Look at Free Banking in the United States." American Economic Review 75 (1985): 881-885.

 

Macesich, George. "Sources of Monetary Disturbances in the U.S., 1834-1845." The Journal of Economic History 20 (1960): 407-34.

 

Redlich, Fritz. The Molding of American Banking: Men and Ideas. New York: Hafner, 1947 and 1951, 2 vols.

 

Rolnick, Arthur J. and Warren E. Weber. "The Causes of Free Bank Failures: A Detailed Examination of the Evidence." Journal of Monetary Economics 14 (1984): 267‑91.

 

Cormac O’Grada and Eugene N. White, “The Panics of 1854 and 1857: A View from the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank,” Journal of Economic History 63 (March 2003), pp. 213-240.

 

 

8. Friday, February 9

 

Economics of American Slavery (1)

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 13.

 

Fogel, Robert W. and Stanley L. Engerman. Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Two Volumes. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1974, passim.

 

*Fogel, Robert W. and Stanley L. Engerman. "Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South." American Economic Review 67 (1977): 275-296. (JSTOR)

 

Steckel, Richard H. "A Peculiar Population: The Nutrition, Health, and Mortality of American Slaves from Childhood to Maturity." Journal of Economic History 46 (1986): 721-42.

 

Conrad, Alfred H. and John R. Meyer (1958) "The Economics of Slavery in the Ante Bellum South" Journal of Polit­ical Econ­omy 66: 95-130. Reprinted in their book The Economics of Slavery and Other Studies in Econometric History, Chicago: Aldine, 1964: 43-92.

 

Fogel, Robert W. Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery. New York: W.W. Norton Company, 1989.

 

 

 

9. Tuesday, February 13

 

Economics of American Slavery (2)

 

 

A number of papers attacked the evidence offered by Fogel and Engerman to show that slave agriculture was more efficient than free agriculture. These include the following.

 

*Fogel, Robert W. and Stanley L. Engerman. "Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South: Reply."  American Economic Review 70 (1980): 672-690. (JSTOR)

 

Wright, Gavin "The Efficiency of Slavery: Another Interpretation." American Economic Review 69 (1979): 219-26. (JSTOR)

 

David, Paul A. and Peter Temin. (1979) "Explaining the Relat­ive Effic­iency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South: A Comment." American Economic Review 69: 213-218.

 

Field, Elizabeth B. (1988) "The Relative Efficiency of Slavery Revisited: A Translog Production Function Approach."  American Economic Review 78: 543-549.

 

Schaefer, Donald and Mark D. Schmitz. "The Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture: A Comment." American Economic Review 69 (1979): 208-212.

 

 

    

10. Friday, February 16

 

The Economic Impact of the Civil War

 

*Willard, Kristen L., Timothy W. Guinnane, and Harvey S. Rosen. “Turning Points in the Civil War: Views from the Greenback Market.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 4 (Sep., 1996), pp. 1001-1018. (JSTOR)

 

Smith, Gregor W. and R. Todd Smith. “Greenback-Gold Returns and Expectations of Resumption, 1862-1879.” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Sep., 1997), pp. 697-717.

 

Engerman, Stanley. "The Economic Impact of the Civil War." In The Reinterpretation of American Economic History, Robert Fogel and Stanley Engerman. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

 

Goldin, Claudia, and Frank Lewis. "The Economic Cost of the American Civil War." Journal of Economic History 35 (1975): 294-326.(JSTOR)

 

Temin, Peter. "The Post-Bellum Recovery of the South and the Cost of the Civil War." Journal of Economic History 36 (1976): 898-907.

 

 

 

11. Tuesday, February 20

 

Southern Agriculture After the Civil War (1)

 

                             

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 14.

 

*Ransom, Roger L. and Richard Sutch. “Debt Peonage in the Cotton South After the Civil War.” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 32, No. 3 (Sep., 1972), pp. 641-669. (JSTOR)

 

Ransom, Roger. L., and Richard Sutch. One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977, passim.

 

Alston, Lee, and Robert Higgs. "Contractual Mix in Southern Agriculture since the Civil War: Facts, Hypotheses, and Tests." Journal of Economic History 42 (1982): 327-53.

 

DeCanio, Stephen. Agriculture in the Postbellum South. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1974.

 

 

12. Friday, February 23

 

Southern Agriculture After the Civil War (2)

 

A number of important papers on the Ransom-Sutch thesis were published in a special issue of Explorations in Economic History, including the following three.

 

Ransom, Roger. L., and Richard Sutch. One Kind of Freedom: Reconsidered (and Turbo Charged) Explorations in Economic History. Vol. 38 (1). p 6-39. January 2001.

 

Wright, Gavin. “Comment: Reflections on One Kind of Freedom and the Southern Economy,” 40-47.

 

Engerman, Stanley. “Comment: One Kind of Freedom, A Comparative Perspective,” 64-67.

 

 

Fishback, Price V. "Debt Peonage in Postbellum Georgia," Explorations in Economic History 26 (1989): 219-36.

 

Higgs, Robert. Competition and Coercion: Blacks in the American Economy, 18651914. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977.

 

Margo, Robert A. "Accumulation of Property by Southern Blacks Before World War One: Comment and Further Evidence." American Economic Review 74 (September 1984): 768-76.

 

Margo, Robert A. Race and Schooling in the South, 1880-1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

 

Reid, Joseph. "Sharecropping as an Understandable Market Response: The Postbellum South." Journal of Economic History 33 (1973): 10630.

 

Ransom, Roger L. Conflict and Compromise: The Political Economy of Slavery, Emancipation, and the American Civil War. New York and London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.

 

Wright, Gavin. Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

 

 

 

13. Tuesday, February 27

 

Integration of Domestic Markets

 

One of the basic ideas of economics is that prices of the same good sold in different markets will tend to converge. Economic historians frequently test this theory and use it to analyze economic growth. We will focus on the integration of capital markets, but one could also focus on labor markets, commodity markets, etc.

 

Davis, Lance. "The Investment Market, 1870-1914: Evolution of a National Market." Journal of Economic History 25 (September 1965): 355-99. (JSTOR)

 

Sylla, Richard. “Federal Policy, Banking Market Structure, and Capital Mobilization in the United States, 1863-1913.” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 29, No. 4 (Dec., 1969), pp. 657-686

 

*James, John A. “The Development of the National Money Market, 1893-1911.” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 36, No. 4 (Dec., 1976), pp. 878-897. (JSTOR)

 

Kris James Michener and Ian W. McLean, “U.S. Regional Growth and Convergence, 1880-1980,” Journal of Economic History 59 (December 1999), pp. 1016-1042.

 

Joshua Rosenbloom, “Was There a National Labor Market at the end of the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Economic History 56 (September 1996), pp. 626-656.

 

Jeffrey Williamson, “Globalization, Convergence and History,” Journal of Economic History (1996), pp. 1-30.

 

Jeffrey Williamson, “Globalization, Labor Markets and Policy Backlash in the Past,” Journal of Economic Perspectives (Fall 1998), pp. 51-72.

 

 

 

14. Friday, March 2.

 

Railroads and American Economic Growth (1)

 

                             

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapters 9, 16.

 

*Fogel, Robert W. “A Quantitative Approach to the Study of Railroads in American Economic Growth: A Report of Some Preliminary Findings.” The Journal of Economic History > Vol. 22, No. 2 (Jun., 1962), pp. 163-197.

 

Fogel, Robert W., Railroads and American Economic Growth (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964), pp. 1-146.

 

Coatsworth, John H. "Indispensable Railroads in a Backward Economy: The Case of Mexico." Journal of Economic Hisotry 39 (December 1979): 939-60.

 

David, Paul. "Transport Innovations and Economic Growth: Professor Fogel On and Off the Rails." In Paul David (ed.), Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975), chapter 6.

 

Engerman, Stanley L. "Some Issues Relating to Railroad Subsidies and the Evaluation of Land Grants." Journal of Economic History 32 (June 1972): 443-63.

 

Fishlow, Albert. American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

 

W.W. Rostow. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.

 

 

15. Tuesday, March 6

 

Railroads and American Economic Growth (2)

 

*Lebergott, Stanley. "United States Transport Advance and Externalities." Journal of Economic History 26 (December 1966): 437-61.

 

*Fogel, Robert W. "Notes on the Social Saving Controversy." Journal Of Economic History 39 (March 1979): 1-54.

 

 

 

16. Friday, March 9

 

First Exam

 

 

March 12-March 16

 

Spring Break – work on papers

 

 

17. Tuesday, March 20

                              .

The United States and the Gold Standard

 

*Friedman, Milton and Anna Jacobson Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton University Press for the NBER, 1968, Chapter 3, pp. 89-112, pp.135-183.

 

Bordo, Michael and Hugh Rockoff. "The Gold Standard as a "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval." The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 56, No. 2, Papers Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association (Jun., 1996), pp. 389-428. (JSTOR).

 

Hugh Rockoff, “The Wizard of Oz,” Journal of Political Economy (JSTOR).

 

 

 

18. Friday, March 23

 

Banking Panics and the Founding of the Federal Reserve

 

Kerry Odell and Marc Weidenmier, “Real Shock, Monetary Aftershock: The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake and the Panic of 1907,” Journal of Economic History 64 (December 2004), pp. 1056-1086,

 

**Jeffrey Miron, “Financial Panics, the Seasonality of the Nominal Interest Rate and the Founding of the Fed,” American Economic Review (March 1986). (JSTOR)

 

 

Charles W. Calomiris and Gary Gorton, “The origins of banking panics: Models, facts and bank regulation,”  in R. Glenn Hubbard, ed., Financial Markets and Financial Crises Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

 

Elmus Wicker Banking Panics of the Gilded Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

 

 

Jon Moen and Ellis W. Tallman, “The Bank Panic of 1907: The Role of Trust Companies,” Journal of Economic History 52 (September 1992), pp. 611-630.

 

Jon Moen and Ellis Tallman, “Clearinghouse Membership and Deposit Contraction during the Panic of 1907,” Journal of Economic History 60 (March 2000), pp. 145-163.

 

 

 

19. Tuesday, March 27

 

World War I (1)

 

**Hugh Rockoff, “Until it’s over, over there: the U.S. Economy in World War I,”  in Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, The Economics of World War I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 310-345.

 

Rockoff, Hugh. Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. New York: Cambridge University

Press, chapter 3.

 

Clark, John Maurice. "The Basis of War-Time Collectivism." American Economic Review 7 (1917): 772-790.

 

Clark, John Maurice. The Costs of the War to the American People. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1931.

 

 

20. Friday, March 30

 

World War I (2)

 

*Clark, John Maurice. "The Basis of War-Time Collectivism." American Economic Review 7 (1917): 772-790.

 

Clark, John Maurice. The Costs of the War to the American People. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1931.

 

 

 

 

21. Tuesday, April 3

 

The Roaring Twenties

 

Eugene N. White, “The Stock Market Boom and Crash of 1929 Revisited,”  Journal of Economic Perspectives (Spring 1990), pp. 76-83.

 

*Peter Rappoport and Eugene N. White, “Was the Crash of 1929 Expected?” American Economic Review (March 1994), pp. 271-81. (JSTOR).

 

Libecap, Gary D. "The Political Allocation of Mineral Rights: A Reevalua­tion of Teapot Dome," Journal of Economic History 14(1984): 381-93.

 

 

 

22. Friday, April 6

 

The Great Depression (1)

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 23, 24.

 

**Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965, pp. 299-545, especially 299-332.

 

Temin, Peter. Did Monetary Forces Cause the Great Depression? New York: W.W. Norton, 1976.

 

Bernanke, Benjamin. "Non Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression." American Economic Review 73 (1983): 257-276.

 

Bordo, Michael D. (1989) "The Contribution of A Monetary History of the United States, 1867 - 1960 to monetary history" in Michael D. Bordo (ed.) Money, History, and International Finance: Essays in Honor of Anna J. Schwartz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 15-70.

 

Bordo, Michael D. and Andrew Filardo, NBER Working Paper No. 10833. Issued in October 2004. (Available at www.nber.org).

 

Romer, Christina. "The Great Crash and the Onset of the Great Depression." Quarterly Journal of Economics CV (1990): 597-624.

 

Schwartz, Anna J. "Understanding 1929-33." In Karl Brunner (ed.) The Great Depression Revisited. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981.

 

Temin, Peter. Lessons from the Great Depression Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.

 

White, Eugene N. "A Reinterpretation of the Banking Crisis of 1930." Journal of Economic History 44 (1984): 119-138.

 

 

23. Tuesday, April 10

 

The Great Depression (2)

 

*Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965, pp. 299-545, especially 299-332.

 

 

 

 

24. Friday, April 13

 

World War II (1)

 

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 25.

 

**Friedman, Milton. "Price, Income and Monetary Changes in Three Wartime Periods." American Economic Review (May 1952): 612-625.

 

Evans, Paul. "The Effects of General Price Controls in the United States during World War II." Journal of Political Economy 90 (1982): 944-966.

 

 

Gordon, Robert J. "45 Billion of U.S. Private Investment has been Mislaid." American Economic Review 59 (June 1969): 221-38.

 

Higgs, Robert. "Private Profit, Public Risk: Institutional Antecedents of the Modern Military Procurement System in the Rearmament Program 1940-1941." In Geofrey Mills and Hugh Rockoff, eds., The Sinews of War: Essays on the Economic History of World War II Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1993..

 

Rockoff, Hugh. "The Response of the Giant Corporations to Wage and Price Controls in World War II." Journal of Economic History 41 (March 1981): 123-8.

 

 

25. Tuesday, April 17

 

World War II (2)

 

Rockoff, Hugh. Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, chapters 4 and 5.

 

Galbraith, John Kenneth. A Theory of Price Control. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1952, passim.

 

 

26. Friday, April 20

 

The Evolution of the Labor Market in the Postwar era

 

 

Walton and Rockoff, History of the American Economy, chapter 30.

 

*Donohue, John J., III, and James Heckman. "Continuous Versus Episodic Change: The Impact of Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks." Journal of Economic Literature (December, 1991): 1603-43.

 

Goldin, Claudia. "The Political Economy of Immigration Restriction in the United States, 1890-1921." In Claudia Goldin and Gary D. Libecap (eds.) The Regulated Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER), 1994, 223-258.

 

Goldin, Claudia D. "The Role of World War II in the Rise of Women's Employment." American Economic Review 81 (1991): 741-56.

 

Goldin, Claudia. (1988) "Maximum Hours Legislation and Female Employment: A Reassessment" Journal of Political Economy 97: 535-560.

 

Goldin, Claudia. (1990) Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Goldin, Claudia, and Robert A. Margo. (1992) "The Great Compression: The Wage Structure in the United States at Mid-Century" Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 1-35.

 

Wright, Gavin. "Cheap Labor and Southern Textiles." Quarterly Journal of Economics 96 (1981) : 605-630.

 

 

27. Tuesday, April 24

 

International Convergence

 

 

*Abramovitz, Moses. "Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind." Journal of Economic History XLVI (June 1986): 385-406.

 

 

Baulmol, William J. "Productivity, Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What do the Long-run Data Show." 78 American Economic Review (December 1986): 1072-1085.

 

De Long, J. Bradford. "Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment." 76 American Economic Review (December 1988): 1138-1159.

 

Easterlin, Richard A. "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence." In Paul David and Melvin Reder, eds. Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

 

Gershenkron, Alexander.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective New York: Praeger, 1962.

 

Lebergott, Stanley. The American Economy: Income, Wealth and Want. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.

 

 

 

                          Web Sites

 

The Department of Economics maintains a comprehensive web site at http://economics.rutgers.edu.

 

This should be your first stop for all your economics inquiries.  On the web site you will find information about the faculty, library resources, and internet resources in economics. In particular, try exploring "Other Related Links" for discussion about what economists do, economics resources at Rutgers, and economic resources on the web.

 

For economic historians the most important site is the "cliometrics" web site: http://www.eh.net. The Harvard University site is also useful: http://lms01.harvard.edu


 

                                    

             How to find a topic for your paper.

 

Finding a good topic for your paper will probably be the hardest thing you have to do in the course. Finding topics is also one of the most important skills you will need to develop as a professional economist. You will need to find a topic for your dissertation, and especially if you work in academia, you will need to find topics for research papers.

 

I do not expect a publishable paper or a Ph.D. dissertation. But the process of finding topics is much the same whatever the goal.

 

The search for a topic can follow many different paths. Often it begins with a policy question. How did things really work under the classical gold standard?" What happened to real wages when immigration was so rapid at the turn of the century? In any case, one typically (although not always) begins by reading the frontier literature in the field. But at some point one has to find a way to add to what is already known.

 

With this in mind let us consider some of the ways that economic historians add to our store of knowledge.

 

(1) Explaining an "anomaly" in an existing study. In a famous study of hyperinflation Phillip Cagan showed that a monetarist model emphasizing the rate of inflation explained the data fairly well. But a number of points toward the end of the hyperinflations were "outliers." A number of papers have been written to explain these points, as the result for example, of anticipated monetary reforms.

 

Of course, it would be better (for your grade, for your career, and for the future of civilization) to come up with an entirely new theory that explains hyperinflation better than the monetary theory: Inflation rates are determined by the level of profit-dissonance, which can be measured by the coefficient of variation of profit rates. When the random walk in profit dissonance carries it above 2.05, hyperinflation results. This sort of thing is what Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) called a paradigm shift. But normal research doesn't work this way. Most of us are destined to be the economists who gradually extend and refine Cagan's model.

 

(2) Extending an existing study backwards or forwards in time. Howard Bodenhorn (a successful Rutgers Ph.D from a few years past) and I did a paper in which we extended Lance Davis's study of regional interest rates, which covered the period from the Civil War to the turn of the century, to the pre-civil war period. We had a reason for doing so: we suspected that the Civil War had significantly disrupted the capital market. And it wasn't easy to find the data. If it had been, Lance Davis and many others who have studied the postbellum period, would have extended the data backwards themselves. But it was worth doing, we found considerable evidence of capital market integration in the antebellum period.

 

(3) Repeating a study with data from a different country. When asked why he was touring New Zealand, the balladeer Tom Lehrer said that it was easier to find a new country than a new song. Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz in their book Monetary Trends repeated all of the regressions they ran for the United States for the United Kingdom. The reason being that they had already reached numerous conclusions about the United States from previous studies; the United Kingdom provided an important new test of their ideas.

 

(4) Repeating a study done for one particular market with data from another market. For example, Robert Fogel, a winner of the Nobel prize in economics, estimated the "social savings" created by U.S. railroads in the  interregional transportation of agricultural products. Gary Walton later extended this to passenger traffic on the railroads. Similar calculations could be made for other forms of transportation and for other technological innovations. Stanley Engerman later performed a similar calculation for the Second Bank of the United State. Of course, Fogel's study was more significant than most repetitions are likely to be. The railroad was considered by historians to be one of the most important technological innovations of the nineteenth century, and Fogel showed that its impact was rather small.

 

(5) Repeating a study done for one government regulation for another regulation. Recently, Charles Calomiris and Eugene White studied the political economy of the adoption of Deposit Insurance in the 1930s. There choice was motivated by current policy considerations. But I would guess that almost any piece of federal legislation would repay careful study. At the very least a reading of the Congressional Record and of the Congressional hearings would reveal which economic interest groups promoted and opposed a particular piece of legislation.

 

(6) Discovering a body of unexploited data. Frequently, the order of things is reversed -- a researcher finds the data and then looks for interesting questions the data can answer. Recently, Lance Davis and Robert Gallman completed a massive study of the U.S. whaling industry in the nineteenth century. This project has yielded a large number of research papers and has drawn considerable attention. It began when Gallman stumbled on the remarkably complete records of the American whaling industry while searching for something else in the library. (Considerable detail is available on every whale caught by an American vessel including length, weight, oil content, marital status, and previous arrest record.)

 

As an experiment I tried opening the Historical Statistics of the United States, the most important compendium of historical data, randomly. I landed on page 690 which gives annual data on cigar and cigarette production from 1870 to 1970. It naturally brought to mind certain questions -- Is price data available in the primary sources cited in the Historical Statistics?; did cigarette consumption rise at the expense of cigar consumption, or did total consumption of tobacco products increase?; when have there been changes in the federal tax on cigarettes?; can Gary Becker's theory of rational addiction be tested with this data; etc. etc. And, of course, the sobering thought that if the data is this good, someone has probably already done the study.

 

(7) Reexamining older studies using new statistical or theoretical models. Econometrics is constantly changing, some would say progressing. Often new statistical techniques can show that conclusions drawn previously by using more primitive techniques are in error. New theories can also provide a basis for reexamining old data. Cagan's study of hyperinflations is again a good example. As new theories were developed in macroeconomics, such as rational expectations, they were tested on Cagan's data.

 

(8) Following up published suggestions for future research. Many books and journal articles contain suggestions for future research. These are sometimes worth considering. Naturally, you have to ask yourself why the author is willing to share a valuable idea with strangers. But there are circumstances when it appears that useful suggestions have been made.

 

(9) Reexamining one of the "myths" of economics. The classic example in this genre is Ronald Coase, "The Lighthouse in Economics," Journal of Law and Economics, 1974, 357-76. Economic theorists since John Stuart Mill have used the lighthouse as an example of a public good: a valuable service, but one the private sector would not produce since there is no way to charge the ships that benefit from the lighthouse. Coase examined the actual history of lighthouse finance, and showed that the true story is far more complicated.

 

(10) Surveying the literature on a particular question. This is usually what students think of as research, and I would like you to stay away from survey articles if you can. I would prefer that you get some empirical data and try to analyze it. Most survey articles don't add to knowledge. But some do, by generalizing from various studies, or by developing a framework that brings various pieces of work together. So I don't want to make a blanket statement that survey articles are unacceptable, but you will have to persuade me that your survey will add to knowledge, and won't simply be a summary of what other people have said.

 

(11) Asking someone for a topic. Its perfectly acceptable to ask people to suggest a topic.

 

You can ask me. I have a list of topics you can choose from, although I would like you to at least make an effort to find a topic on your own. I can also help you turn a general question or interest into a paper topic.

 

You can ask one of the other professors in the Department. Of course, you need to be polite. Make an appointment, realize that the professor is mostly interested in his or her own research. Perhaps you can help the professor by exploring an aspect of a question in which they are interested.